This is
my reflection after reading the introduction. I am hoping that the progression
of my thinking will be evident in my reflections as I progress through the book
and learn more about how this can work in my classroom. Questions I ponder may
well be answered in further chapters…
Introduction:
Understanding the Urgency
What is it about
Emily Moskam’s Math class that engages the students?
The students are all actively involved.
They can share or offer their ideas and build on each other’s ideas.
They get time to work by themselves and time to work with others.
The problems were interesting and challenging.
They can choose methods using whatever knowledge they possess and these
can be informal or formal based on their ability, Therefore it doesn’t matter
what level students are.
They are not told how to solve it so they own the process.
She’s obviously established a culture where it is ok to try things and
fail and try again.
The learning is centred around the students and not her as the teacher.
She is not demonstrating something to them and then they learn it. She is
giving them a problem to encourage them to think about how to solve it
themselves.
The problem is a real world problem with real world mathematics,
therefore it is more authentic.
It isn’t black and white. There is no right way. Any method is valid but
students can learn from each other if someone has a better method than theirs
and they therefore may choose to adopt it.
What lesson can we
learn and apply to our context/ year levels?
I learned so much here. Dinah Harvey has been preaching this stuff for
years and I see more than ever that she was right. I feel very excited after
only reading the introduction so far and am already visualising how I can make
this work in my classroom.
I think the last few years my focus has been on meeting the national
standards. I have been very successful in getting students to make accelerated
progress in maths with regards to these standards but I haven’t done an
especially great job at preparing them for ‘real world maths’. I have definitely
been moving towards this more and more, particularly last year where I started
to try to make my Maths programme more relevant and engaging. My focus has been
on personalised learning which essentially involves students looking for their
learning goals in their assessment data and deciding how to meet these.
Overall the majority of my students come away loving Maths because I am
passionate and excited about Maths. I love it myself. I am also very positive
and encouraging. There is a big ‘but’ coming here. I don’t think that I have
prepared my students for the world with my teaching of maths. I have prepared
them for high school by ensuring they meet the standards. Some how I need to
find a balance between meeting a standard; personalised learning based on
assessment data; real world maths; problem solving and evidenced achievement
and assessment information, that proves progress is being made.
At my level, I can really see a place for this type of learning. My kids
will love it. I know this. My concern is about how to achieve the balance I mentioned
above.
What messages are our
students receiving about Math?
Maths at school and maths in the real world are different.
Maths is about learning rules and formulae that you will never use again
after school.
Being good at Maths means meeting standards.
I am good at Maths if I do well in Maths tests.
What would real Math
look like? Can it be collaborative?
Problems that we actually face in the real world brought into the
classroom. I think it would probably involve manipulating real life objects or
even roleplay. In real life if you don’t know the ‘rule’ or method to solve a
real mathematical problem, you need to use your brain to figure out how to work
it out which may involve physically carrying out a task in a hands on kind of
way rather than a formal written method kind of way. Learning to use the tools
or resources within your surroundings is a great real life skill and I can see
so much value in that for the workforce.
What negatives can
you see or questions do you have after reading this chapter?
Not a negative but my role is to prepare students for high school
(actually my real role is to prepare them for THE WORLD). Some how I need to
make sure that if I am teaching content through problem solving that the
students still learn all of the content within each strand. Therefore, my Maths
problems will need to cover all aspects and I probably need a way to track
that. Also I will need resources in the form of suitable rich questions that
will actually cover all of that content. My thinking right now is that I would
still teach strand units e.g. Geometry, Measurement, Statistics etc but I will
need rich questions within those that cover everything high school students
will need to know.
My brain is arguing with itself right now because I feel I’m
contradicting myself. If students can really solve problems in any way they
choose (with the right skills and a decent amount of maths knowledge), then
they should be well prepared for high school if I teach through problem solving.
The goal is to learn SKILLS NOT CONTENT KNOWLEDGE.
My concern is that high school maths is very much based on standardised
testing, written algorithms, formulae and rules and NOT real world maths. It is
very much based on knowledge and NOT skills.
Questions
1) What shall I
measure with regards to progress? Skills? Knowledge of content? Repertoire of
strategies? Achievement within
curriculum levels according to mathematical progressions? All of the above? What
is the priority and why?
2) How can I
measure it?
3) How can I
approach this problem solving style of teaching whilst still personalising
learning for each student towards their learning goals? Where do these goals
now come from? What will the students base them on? Will they be related to
problem solving skills or the coverage of mathematical content?
Introduction: The
Mathematics of Work and Life.
What is the place of Maths
in the future? What skills, knowledge and dispositions will our students need?
Quote from the book:
‘Focus on performing computational manipulations is unlikely to prepare
students for the problem solving demands of the high tech work place’.
Skills needed for the future include;
Flexibility, continuous learning, team work, collaboration, communication
skills, persistence, problem solving, ability to think through problems and
deal with situations when things go wrong, These skills are all transferable to
areas aside from Maths.
How do we grow
confidence in our students and a love of Maths?
Give them relevant, authentic, real world math problems so they can see a
purpose for the learning after they leave school.
Teach them about the growth mindset and the fact that they can grow their
ability in math as you aren’t born to be good at maths or not good at maths.
Make it fun.
Make it hands-on and practical.
Value all contributions.
Value all contributions.
Encourage learning from each other.
Encourage creativity, different perspectives, ideas and solutions.
Make it student centred and not teacher directed.
Teach them how to cope with and learn from failure.
Establish a positive learning culture in the classroom.
What does real life
Maths look like? What generalizations and approximation do regular
mathematicians apply to be successful?
Example from the book included the
nurses measuring dosage.
Here some ways I use it in my life….
Measuring whilst baking.
Working out discounts in a shop.
Playing pool and working out where to
hit a ball to make it go into a hole.
Counting calories and converting
kilojoules into calories using estimation.
Working out how much paint is needed to
paint the ceiling.
Calculating distance, speed etc when
running, swimming. E.g. If it takes me 30seconds to swim 50metres, how long
should it take me to swim 1km? What is my speed in km per hour?
Mixing cleaning solution with water
using ratios
Volume of a container- how much liquid
can it hold?
Budgeting
How much will the interest on my loan
cost at X% over Y months?
Here are some things I apply to be
successful….
I use a lot of rounding and estimation
in my real life for maths. I use a ton of mental strategies to work things out
and very rarely will use paper or a calculator.
I definitely rely on my times tables a
lot and basic addition and subtraction so I feel that this is crucial to my use
of more advanced strategies. I also regularly convert between fractions,
decimals and percentages. I can easily convert between units of measurement to
work out problems if necessary when measuring things.